Xeon Gold 5520+ vs Core 2 Quad Q9505

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9505
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.23
Xeon Gold 5520+
2023, $1,640
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
34.73
+2724%

Xeon Gold 5520+ outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by a whopping 2724% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2517123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.80
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.3918.15
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date2009 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,640

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Xeon Gold 5520+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads456
Base clock speed2.83 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.83 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache52.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size164 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C85 °C
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Xeon Gold 5520+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA775,LGA7754677
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Xeon Gold 5520+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Xeon Gold 5520+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Xeon Gold 5520+ are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Xeon Gold 5520+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Xeon Gold 5520+.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 1.23
Xeon Gold 5520+ 34.73
+2724%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 2176
Samples: 219
Xeon Gold 5520+ 61227
+2714%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 34.73
Physical cores 4 28
Threads 4 56
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 205 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9505 has 115.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5520+, on the other hand, has a 2723.6% higher aggregate performance score, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5520+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9505 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5520+ is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Core 2 Quad Q9505
Intel Xeon Gold 5520+
Xeon Gold 5520+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 46 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 5520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Xeon Gold 5520+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.