Turion II P520 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9505
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.23
+151%

Core 2 Quad Q9505 outperforms Turion II P520 by a whopping 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25243144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Turion II
Power efficiency0.550.83
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date2009 (16 years ago)12 May 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Turion II P520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.83 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.83 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size164 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Turion II P520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA775,LGA775S1 (S1g4)
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Turion II P520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Turion II P520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Turion II P520 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Turion II P520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Turion II P520.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 1.23
+151%
Turion II P520 0.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 2176
+150%
Samples: 219
Turion II P520 870
Samples: 124

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 360
+24.6%
Turion II P520 289

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 1051
+101%
Turion II P520 522

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 0.49
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9505 has a 151% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Turion II P520, on the other hand, has 280% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion II P520 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9505 is a desktop processor while Turion II P520 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Core 2 Quad Q9505
AMD Turion II P520
Turion II P520

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 46 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 52 votes

Rate Turion II P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Turion II P520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.