Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9505
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.36
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2025
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
13.42
+887%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by a whopping 887% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2292574
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency1.3645.62
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025)
Release date2009 (16 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed2.83 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.83 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHz54 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache8 MB
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size164 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA775,LGA775FP8
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 1.36
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 13.42
+887%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 2171
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 21496
+890%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.36 13.42
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 28 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9505 has -75% more threads.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 886.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 239.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9505 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9505 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Core 2 Quad Q9505
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 46 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.