EPYC 9654 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9505
2009
95 Watt
1.37
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
78.30
+5615%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by a whopping 5615% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.6910.16
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameno dataGenoa
Release date1 July 2009 (14 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current price$42 $4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9654 has 278% better value for money than Core 2 Quad Q9505.

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data96
Threadsno data192
Base clock speed2.83 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFCLGA775,LGA775SP5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 1.37
EPYC 9654 78.30
+5615%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 5615% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Quad Q9505 2144
EPYC 9654 122164
+5598%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 5598% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Quad Q9505 358
EPYC 9654 1823
+409%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 409% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Quad Q9505 1037
EPYC 9654 18430
+1677%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 1677% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.37 78.30
Recency 1 July 2009 10 November 2022
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9505 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9505 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Core 2 Quad Q9505
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 41 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 982 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9505 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.