Core i7-1068G7 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-1068G7 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by a whopping 289% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2548 | 1447 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7 |
| Power efficiency | 0.55 | 7.27 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) |
| Release date | 2009 (17 years ago) | 1 August 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-1068G7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.83 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | OPI |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 4 × 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 23 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 164 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 456 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-1068G7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA775,LGA775 | Intel BGA1440 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-1068G7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-1068G7 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-1068G7 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-1068G7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 59.732 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-1068G7.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.24 | 4.82 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 28 Watt |
i7-1068G7 has a 288.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 239.3% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core i7-1068G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 in performance tests.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q9505 is a desktop processor while Core i7-1068G7 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
