Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Core 2 Quad Q9505

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2136not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.69no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameno dataWindsor (2006−2009)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)
Current price$42 $77

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.83 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data512K
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data220 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA775,LGA775AM2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Quad Q9505 2149
+211%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 692

Core 2 Quad Q9505 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4000+ by 211% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Quad Q9505 358
+83.6%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 195

Core 2 Quad Q9505 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4000+ by 84% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Quad Q9505 1037
+186%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 363

Core 2 Quad Q9505 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4000+ by 186% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 89 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Core 2 Quad Q9505
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Athlon 64 X2 4000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 41 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 184 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9505 or Athlon 64 X2 4000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.