Xeon Phi SE10X vs Core 2 Quad Q9500
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon Phi SE10X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2212 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.39 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Knights Corner (2012−2014) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 12 November 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon Phi SE10X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 61 (Henihexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 244 |
| Base clock speed | 2.83 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 350 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 5,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon Phi SE10X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | PCIe x16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 300 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon Phi SE10X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon Phi SE10X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon Phi SE10X are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon Phi SE10X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3, DDR4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 61 |
| Threads | 4 | 244 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 300 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q9500 has 215.8% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi SE10X, on the other hand, has 1425% more physical cores and 6000% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon Phi SE10X. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q9500 is a desktop processor while Xeon Phi SE10X is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon Phi SE10X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
