EPYC Embedded 9654P vs Core 2 Quad Q9500

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9500 and EPYC Embedded 9654P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2207not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.39no data
Architecture codenameno dataGenoa (2022−2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)14 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9500 and EPYC Embedded 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed2.83 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9500 and EPYC Embedded 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketLGA775SP5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and EPYC Embedded 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9500 and EPYC Embedded 9654P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and EPYC Embedded 9654P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and EPYC Embedded 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and EPYC Embedded 9654P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 360 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9500 has 278.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 9654P, on the other hand, has 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9500 and EPYC Embedded 9654P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9500 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 9654P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9500 and EPYC Embedded 9654P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
Core 2 Quad Q9500
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P
EPYC Embedded 9654P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1207 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9500 or EPYC Embedded 9654P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.