Core i3-2367M vs Core 2 Quad Q9500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core 2 Quad Q8200 Core 2 Quad Q8300 Core 2 Quad Q8400 Core 2 Quad Q9300 Core 2 Quad Q9400 Core 2 Quad Q9400s Core 2 Quad Q9450 Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9505 Core 2 Quad Q9505S Core 2 Quad Q9550s Core 2 Quad Q9650
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-2310M Core i3-2330M Core i3-2350M Core i5-2410M Core i5-2430M Core i5-2450M Core i5-2520M Core i5-2540M Core i7-2630QM Core i7-2640M Core i7-2670QM Pentium B960

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9500
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.40
+164%
Core i3-2367M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.53

Core 2 Quad Q9500 outperforms Core i3-2367M by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
i3-2367M i3-2367M

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Core i3-2367M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22122846
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency1.392.95
Architecture codenameno dataSandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 October 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$250

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Core i3-2367M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.83 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data1.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate1333 MHz4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data256K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data149 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data624 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Core i3-2367M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA775FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Core i3-2367M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching--
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Core i3-2367M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Core i3-2367M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data-
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Core i3-2367M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Core i3-2367M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Core i3-2367M.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9500 1.40
+164%
i3-2367M 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9500 2224
+163%
i3-2367M 847

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q9500 364
+63.2%
i3-2367M 223

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q9500 1023
+114%
i3-2367M 477

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.40 0.53
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 17 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9500 has a 164.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

i3-2367M, on the other hand, has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 458.8% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q9500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2367M in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9500 is a desktop processor while Core i3-2367M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Core i3-2367M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
Core 2 Quad Q9500
Intel Core i3-2367M
Core i3-2367M
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
vs
i3-3210 Core i3 3210
i3-2367M Core i3 2367M
vs
Turion II M500 Turion II M500
Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
vs
Pentium G3460 Pentium G3460
Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
vs
A8-4555M A8 4555M
Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
vs
Pentium N3540 Pentium N3540
Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
vs
A6-4400M A6 4400M
Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
vs
Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U
Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
vs
Celeron B820 Celeron B820
Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
vs
E-450 E 450
Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
vs
Atom D2550 Atom D2550
Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
vs
i7-640M Core i7 640M
Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
vs
i5-560M Core i5 560M
Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
vs
i7-720QM Core i7 720QM

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 1209 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 43 votes

Rate Core i3-2367M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9500 or Core i3-2367M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.