Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE vs Core 2 Quad Q9500

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2225not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.39no data
Architecture codenameno dataWindsor (2006−2007)
Release dateno dataMay 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.83 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data220 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775AM2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9500 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
Core 2 Quad Q9500
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1225 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4200 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9500 or Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.