Xeon 6780E vs Core 2 Quad Q9450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9450
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.26
Xeon 6780E
2024, $11,350
144 cores / 144 threads, 330 Watt
49.56
+3833%

Xeon 6780E outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9450 by a whopping 3833% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking254756
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.28
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.566.34
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release dateMarch 2008 (18 years ago)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,350

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Xeon 6780E: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)144
Threads4144
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB (shared)4 MB (per module)
L3 cache0 KB108 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C85 °C
Number of transistors820 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Xeon 6780E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt330 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Xeon 6780E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Xeon 6780E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Xeon 6780E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Xeon 6780E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5-6400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Xeon 6780E.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data88

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Quad Q9450 1.26
Xeon 6780E 49.56
+3833%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9450 2203
Samples: 843
Xeon 6780E 86734
+3837%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 49.56
Physical cores 4 144
Threads 4 144
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 330 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9450 has 247% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6780E, on the other hand, has a 3833% higher aggregate performance score, and 3500% more physical cores and 3500% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6780E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9450 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6780E is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 201 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 18 votes

Rate Xeon 6780E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Xeon 6780E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.