Processor N100 vs Core 2 Quad Q9450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9450
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.26
Processor N100
2023, $128
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
2.19
+73.8%

Processor N100 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9450 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25472083
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.77
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency0.5615.40
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release dateMarch 2008 (18 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$128

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.66 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Processor N100.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Quad Q9450 1.26
Processor N100 2.19
+73.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9450 2203
Samples: 843
Processor N100 5333
+142%
Samples: 3843

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 2.19
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N100 has a 74% higher aggregate performance score, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 1483% lower power consumption.

The Intel Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9450 is a desktop processor while Processor N100 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 201 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1891 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Processor N100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.