Turion 64 ML-44 vs Core 2 Quad Q9400
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Quad Q9400 outperforms Turion 64 ML-44 by a whopping 415% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2370 | 3267 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Turion 64 |
Power efficiency | 1.35 | 0.71 |
Designer | Intel | AMD |
Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
Release date | August 2008 (16 years ago) | January 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Turion 64 ML-44 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.67 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 800 MHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 2x 81 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 456 million | 114 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Turion 64 ML-44 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | LGA775 | 754 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Turion 64 ML-44. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
PowerNow | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Turion 64 ML-44 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Turion 64 ML-44 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Turion 64 ML-44. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.34 | 0.26 |
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q9400 has a 415.4% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 ML-44, on the other hand, has 171.4% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 ML-44 in performance tests.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q9400 is a desktop processor while Turion 64 ML-44 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.