Xeon E-2478 vs Core 2 Quad Q9300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9300
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.25
Xeon E-2478
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
18.78
+1402%

Xeon E-2478 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9300 by a whopping 1402% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Xeon E-2478 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2312320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data82.67
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.2522.22
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$568

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Xeon E-2478 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Threads416
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHz16 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Xeon E-2478 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Xeon E-2478. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Xeon E-2478 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Xeon E-2478 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Xeon E-2478. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Xeon E-2478.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9300 1.25
Xeon E-2478 18.78
+1402%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9300 1986
Xeon E-2478 29827
+1402%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 18.78
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon E-2478 has a 1402.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 18.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2478 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9300 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9300 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2478 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Xeon E-2478, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Core 2 Quad Q9300
Intel Xeon E-2478
Xeon E-2478

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 772 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2478 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9300 or Xeon E-2478, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.