Pentium 997 vs Core 2 Quad Q9300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9300
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.27
+144%

Core 2 Quad Q9300 outperforms Pentium 997 by a whopping 144% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium 997 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22032762
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.00no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)1 September 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134
Current price$76 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium 997 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache6 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium 997 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium 997. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI--
FMAno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching--
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium 997 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium 997 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium 997. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.3 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium 997 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium 997.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9300 1.27
+144%
Pentium 997 0.52

Core 2 Quad Q9300 outperforms Pentium 997 by 144% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Quad Q9300 1972
+144%
Pentium 997 809

Core 2 Quad Q9300 outperforms Pentium 997 by 144% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Quad Q9300 315
+30.7%
Pentium 997 241

Core 2 Quad Q9300 outperforms Pentium 997 by 31% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Quad Q9300 864
+103%
Pentium 997 425

Core 2 Quad Q9300 outperforms Pentium 997 by 103% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.27 0.52
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 17 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9300 has a 144.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Pentium 997, on the other hand, has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 458.8% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q9300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 997 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9300 is a desktop processor while Pentium 997 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium 997, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Core 2 Quad Q9300
Intel Pentium 997
Pentium 997

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 734 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 8 votes

Rate Pentium 997 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9300 or Pentium 997, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.