Turion 64 MT-32 vs Core 2 Quad Q9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 Core 2 Duo P8400 Core 2 Duo P8600 Core 2 Duo P8700 Core 2 Duo T6600 Core 2 Duo T8100 Core 2 Duo T8300 Core 2 Duo T9300 Core 2 Duo T9500 Core 2 Duo T9600 Core 2 Duo T9900 Pentium Dual Core T4200 Pentium Dual Core T4300 Pentium Dual Core T4400 Pentium Dual Core T4500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-32 Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-40 Turion 64 ML-42 Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-34 Turion 64 MT-37 Turion 64 MT-40

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9000
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.99
+450%
Turion 64 MT-32
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.18

Core 2 Quad Q9000 outperforms Turion 64 MT-32 by a whopping 450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Core 2 Quad Q9000 Core 2 Quad Q9000
Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-32

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 MT-32 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24783271
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 QuadTurion 64
Power efficiency2.080.68
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)March 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 MT-32 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.79 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache6 MB512 KB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 MT-32 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478754
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 MT-32. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 MT-32 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 MT-32 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 0.99
+450%
Turion 64 MT-32 0.18

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 2863
+322%
Turion 64 MT-32 679

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.99 0.18
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9000 has a 450% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Turion 64 MT-32, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q9000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-32 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 MT-32, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000
AMD Turion 64 MT-32
Turion 64 MT-32
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 Core 2 Quad Q9000
vs
i7-2657M Core i7 2657M
Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-32
vs
Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
Core 2 Quad Q9000 Core 2 Quad Q9000
vs
A8-5545M A8 5545M
Core 2 Duo P9600 Core 2 Duo P9600
vs
Pentium Dual T3400 Pentium Dual Core T3400
Core 2 Duo P9600 Core 2 Duo P9600
vs
Athlon II X2 250 Athlon II X2 250
Core 2 Duo T9500 Core 2 Duo T9500
vs
Core 2 Extreme QX9650 Core 2 Extreme QX9650
i5-430M Core i5 430M
vs
i3-12100F Core i3 12100F
Core 2 Quad Q9000 Core 2 Quad Q9000
vs
Core 2 Duo T7700 Core 2 Duo T7700
Phenom II X4 N970 Phenom II X4 N970
vs
Phenom II X3 N850 Phenom II X3 N850
Phenom II X4 N970 Phenom II X4 N970
vs
Ryzen 9 7940HS Ryzen 9 7940HS
Core 2 Duo E6700 Core 2 Duo E6700
vs
i7-3540M Core i7 3540M
Core 2 Duo P9500 Core 2 Duo P9500
vs
Core 2 Duo E8500 Core 2 Duo E8500
Core 2 Duo T9400 Core 2 Duo T9400
vs
A6-5200 A6 5200

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

4.9 533 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Turion 64 MT-32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9000 or Turion 64 MT-32, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.