Pentium III 1333 vs Core 2 Quad Q9000

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium III 1333 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2465not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Quadno data
Power efficiency2.08no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Tualatin (2000−2002)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)December 2001 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium III 1333 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data8 KB
L2 cache6 MB256 KB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size107 mm280 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors410 Million44 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium III 1333 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478370
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium III 1333. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium III 1333 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium III 1333 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 30 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9000 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium III 1333, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium III 1333. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Quad Q9000 is a notebook processor while Pentium III 1333 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium III 1333, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000
Intel Pentium III 1333
Pentium III 1333

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 533 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 12 votes

Rate Pentium III 1333 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9000 or Pentium III 1333, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.