Intel Pentium 3825U vs Core 2 Quad Q9000

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9000
1.03
+15.7%

Core 2 Quad Q9000 outperforms Pentium 3825U by 16% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium 3825U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23022396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 QuadIntel Pentium
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Broadwell-U (2015)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years old)1 March 2015 (9 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$348$161
Current price$133 (0.4x MSRP)$90 (0.6x MSRP)

Technical specs

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium 3825U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors410 Million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium 3825U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium 3825U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data-
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium 3825U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium 3825U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium 3825U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data850 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium 3825U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium 3825U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium 3825U.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 1.03
+15.7%
Pentium 3825U 0.89

Core 2 Quad Q9000 outperforms Pentium 3825U by 16% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Quad Q9000 1579
+15%
Pentium 3825U 1373

Core 2 Quad Q9000 outperforms Pentium 3825U by 15% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Quad Q9000 264
Pentium 3825U 315
+19.3%

Pentium 3825U outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by 19% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Quad Q9000 682
+7.4%
Pentium 3825U 635

Core 2 Quad Q9000 outperforms Pentium 3825U by 7% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Quad Q9000 2396
Pentium 3825U 2951
+23.2%

Pentium 3825U outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by 23% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Quad Q9000 8008
+22.5%
Pentium 3825U 6537

Core 2 Quad Q9000 outperforms Pentium 3825U by 23% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Quad Q9000 2863
+10.4%
Pentium 3825U 2594

Core 2 Quad Q9000 outperforms Pentium 3825U by 10% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Core 2 Quad Q9000 20.25
+25.5%
Pentium 3825U 25.41

Pentium 3825U outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by 25% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Core 2 Quad Q9000 2
+11.3%
Pentium 3825U 2

Core 2 Quad Q9000 outperforms Pentium 3825U by 11% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.03 0.89
Recency 1 January 2009 1 March 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Cost $348 $161
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

The Core 2 Quad Q9000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 3825U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium 3825U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000
Intel Pentium 3825U
Pentium 3825U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 530 votes

Rate Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 64 votes

Rate Intel Pentium 3825U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9000 or Pentium 3825U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.