Core i9-10880H vs Core 2 Quad Q9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9000
2009, $348
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.91
Core i9-10880H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
8.13
+793%

Core i9-10880H outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by a whopping 793% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27891086
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 QuadIntel Comet Lake
Power efficiency0.857.63
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date1 January 2009 (17 years ago)2 April 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core i9-10880H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache6 MB2 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache16 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core i9-10880H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core i9-10880H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core i9-10880H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core i9-10880H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core i9-10880H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 0.91
i9-10880H 8.13
+793%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 1597
Samples: 204
i9-10880H 14240
+792%
Samples: 19

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 8.13
Recency 1 January 2009 2 April 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm

i9-10880H has a 793.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core i9-10880H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000
Intel Core i9-10880H
Core i9-10880H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 541 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 61 votes

Rate Core i9-10880H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core i9-10880H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.