Core i5-10600KF vs Core 2 Quad Q8400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q8400
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.34
Core i5-10600KF
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
9.20
+587%

i5-10600KF outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8400 by a whopping 587% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Core i5-10600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2207816
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date19 April 2009 (15 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Core i5-10600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.666 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.67 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size2x 82 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C72 °C
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Core i5-10600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket7751200
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Core i5-10600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSXno data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Core i5-10600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Core i5-10600KF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Core i5-10600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Core i5-10600KF.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q8400 1.34
i5-10600KF 9.20
+587%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q8400 2066
i5-10600KF 14230
+589%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q8400 327
i5-10600KF 1699
+420%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q8400 892
i5-10600KF 6767
+659%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.34 9.20
Recency 19 April 2009 30 April 2020
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm

i5-10600KF has a 586.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-10600KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q8400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Core i5-10600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
Core 2 Quad Q8400
Intel Core i5-10600KF
Core i5-10600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1291 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 847 votes

Rate Core i5-10600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8400 or Core i5-10600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.