Xeon L3110 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Quad Q8300
2008
4 cores / 4 threads
1.22
+40.2%

Core 2 Quad Q8300 outperforms Xeon L3110 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon L3110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22182436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)no data
Release dateNovember 2008 (15 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Current price$16.63 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon L3110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C79 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon L3110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon L3110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon L3110 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon L3110 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon L3110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 1.22
+40.2%
Xeon L3110 0.87

Core 2 Quad Q8300 outperforms Xeon L3110 by 40% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Quad Q8300 1888
+41.1%
Xeon L3110 1338

Core 2 Quad Q8300 outperforms Xeon L3110 by 41% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 0.87
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 45 Watt

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L3110 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Quad Q8300 is a desktop processor while Xeon L3110 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon L3110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
Core 2 Quad Q8300
Intel Xeon L3110
Xeon L3110

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 566 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L3110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8300 or Xeon L3110, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.