UHD Graphics 605 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8300 and UHD Graphics 605 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2340not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Power efficiency1.19no data
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Gen9.5
Release dateNovember 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8300 and UHD Graphics 605 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz0.25 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size2x 81 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8300 and UHD Graphics 605 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and UHD Graphics 605. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8300 and UHD Graphics 605 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and UHD Graphics 605. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data8,192 MB 8,388,608 KB 8,589,934,592 B 0.00781 TiB 8 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 605 has a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q8300 and UHD Graphics 605. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q8300 is a desktop processor while UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8300 and UHD Graphics 605, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
Core 2 Quad Q8300
Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 590 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 17 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8300 or UHD Graphics 605, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.