Phenom II X4 805 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Quad Q8300
2008
4 cores / 4 threads
1.22
Phenom II X4 805
2009
4 cores / 4 threads
1.27
+4.1%

Phenom II X4 805 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8300 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Phenom II X4 805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22032165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.334.93
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release dateNovember 2008 (15 years old)February 2009 (15 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$174
Current price$51 $25 (0.1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Phenom II X4 805 has 48% better value for money than Core 2 Quad Q8300.

Technical specs

Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Phenom II X4 805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2258 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Phenom II X4 805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Phenom II X4 805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Phenom II X4 805 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Phenom II X4 805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 1.22
Phenom II X4 805 1.27
+4.1%

Phenom II X4 805 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8300 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Quad Q8300 1883
Phenom II X4 805 1959
+4%

Phenom II X4 805 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8300 by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.22 1.27

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Phenom II X4 805. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Phenom II X4 805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
Core 2 Quad Q8300
AMD Phenom II X4 805
Phenom II X4 805

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 561 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8300 or Phenom II X4 805, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.