Apple M2 Max vs Core 2 Quad Q8300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q8300
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.22
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
14.71
+1106%

Apple M2 Max outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8300 by a whopping 1106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2240456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)no data
Release dateNovember 2008 (15 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$16.63 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)3.3 MB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)36 MB
L3 cache0 KB48 MB
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 million67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Apple M2 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Apple M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 1.22
Apple M2 Max 14.71
+1106%

Apple M2 Max outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8300 by 1106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Quad Q8300 1890
Apple M2 Max 26453
+1300%

Apple M2 Max outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8300 by 1300% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 14.71
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 79 Watt

The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q8300 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q8300 is a desktop processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
Core 2 Quad Q8300
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 573 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 220 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8300 or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.