Xeon w7-3555 vs Core 2 Quad Q8200
Aggregate performance score
Xeon w7-3555 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8200 by a whopping 3622% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2710 | 102 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 17.47 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.46 | 5.03 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | August 2008 (17 years ago) | 24 August 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,339 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 28 |
| Threads | 4 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 75 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 2x 81 mm2 | 4x 477 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | 78 °C |
| Number of transistors | 456 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 325 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3555 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3555 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3555.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 112 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.04 | 38.71 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 28 |
| Threads | 4 | 56 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 325 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q8200 has 242% lower power consumption.
Xeon w7-3555, on the other hand, has a 3622% higher aggregate performance score, and 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.
The Intel Xeon w7-3555 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 in performance tests.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q8200 is a desktop processor while Xeon w7-3555 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
