Ryzen AI 9 465 vs Core 2 Quad Q8200
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 9 465 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8200 by a whopping 1154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2706 | 676 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.46 | 19.67 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Gorgon Point (2026) |
| Release date | August 2008 (17 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Ryzen AI 9 465 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | no data |
| Die size | 2x 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 456 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Ryzen AI 9 465 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | LGA775 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Ryzen AI 9 465. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Ryzen AI 9 465 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Ryzen AI 9 465 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Ryzen AI 9 465. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.04 | 13.04 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 10 |
| Threads | 4 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 465 has a 1153.8% higher aggregate performance score, 150% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and 239.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 in performance tests.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q8200 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 9 465 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
