Core i9-9980XE vs Core 2 Quad Q8200
Aggregate performance score
Core i9-9980XE outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8200 by a whopping 1500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2705 | 475 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.85 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i9 |
| Power efficiency | 0.46 | 4.26 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| Release date | August 2008 (17 years ago) | 19 October 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,979 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core i9-9980XE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 36 |
| Base clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 30 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 24.75 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 81 mm2 | 484 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 84 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 456 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core i9-9980XE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | LGA775 | FCLGA2066 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core i9-9980XE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core i9-9980XE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core i9-9980XE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core i9-9980XE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core i9-9980XE.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 44 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.04 | 16.64 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 18 |
| Threads | 4 | 36 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 165 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q8200 has 73.7% lower power consumption.
i9-9980XE, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher aggregate performance score, 350% more physical cores and 800% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Core i9-9980XE is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
