Atom D525 vs Core 2 Quad Q8200

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2390not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.12no data
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$63

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.33 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size2x 81 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 1781
+343%
Atom D525 402

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 293
+281%
Atom D525 77

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 824
+341%
Atom D525 187

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 13 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q8200 has 100% more physical cores.

Atom D525, on the other hand, has 630.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Atom D525. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q8200 is a desktop processor while Atom D525 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Core 2 Quad Q8200
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 541 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 215 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8200 or Atom D525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.