Xeon E5-2699R v4 vs Core 2 Quad Q7600
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Xeon E5-2699R v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 31 August 2009 (15 years ago) | 25 October 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,560 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Xeon E5-2699R v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 22 (Docosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 44 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 2 × 9.6 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 22 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 5.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 55 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 82 mm2 | 456.12 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 456 million | 7200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Xeon E5-2699R v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | 775 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 145 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Xeon E5-2699R v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Xeon E5-2699R v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Xeon E5-2699R v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1,536 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Xeon E5-2699R v4.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 31 August 2009 | 25 October 2016 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 22 |
| Threads | 4 | 44 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 145 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q7600 has 52.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-2699R v4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 450% more physical cores and 1000% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Xeon E5-2699R v4. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Quad Q7600 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2699R v4 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Xeon E5-2699R v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
