Core Ultra 7 265K vs Core 2 Quad Q7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated80
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data96.97
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data28.67
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date31 August 2009 (15 years ago)24 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size2x 82 mm2243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket7751851
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 August 2009 24 October 2024
Physical cores 4 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q7600 has 31.6% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Core Ultra 7 265K. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q7600
Core 2 Quad Q7600
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 27 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 21 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q7600 or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.