Celeron P1053 vs Core 2 Quad Q7600
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Celeron P1053 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Jasper Forest (2010) |
| Release date | 31 August 2009 (15 years ago) | 12 February 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Celeron P1053 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 2x 82 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 456 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Celeron P1053 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 775 | 1366 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Celeron P1053. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Celeron P1053 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Celeron P1053. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Celeron P1053.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 31 August 2009 | 12 February 2010 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 30 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q7600 has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron P1053, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 216.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Celeron P1053. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q7600 is a desktop processor while Celeron P1053 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Celeron P1053, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
