A6-8500P vs Core 2 Quad Q6700

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q6700
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 105 Watt
1.35
+45.2%

Core 2 Quad Q6700 outperforms A6-8500P by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q6700 and A6-8500P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22202492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Carrizo
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release dateApril 2007 (17 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q6700 and A6-8500P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.66 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache8 MB (shared)1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die size2x 143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)62 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q6700 and A6-8500P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775FP4
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q6700 and A6-8500P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q6700 and A6-8500P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q6700 and A6-8500P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q6700 and A6-8500P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3Not Listed
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Quad Q6700 and A6-8500P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 2 Quad Q6700 and A6-8500P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q6700 and A6-8500P.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q6700 1.35
+45.2%
A6-8500P 0.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q6700 2093
+44.8%
A6-8500P 1445

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 0.93
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 15 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q6700 has a 45.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A6-8500P, on the other hand, has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 600% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-8500P in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q6700 is a desktop processor while A6-8500P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6700 and A6-8500P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
Core 2 Quad Q6700
AMD A6-8500P
A6-8500P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 134 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate A6-8500P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q6700 or A6-8500P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.