Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Core 2 Quad Q6600

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q6600
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 105 Watt
1.14
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
6.81
+497%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Core 2 Quad Q6600 by a whopping 497% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24301058
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Quad (Desktop)AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency1.039.98
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release dateno data21 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
Multiplierno data38
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm
Die size2x 143 mm2156 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket775AM4
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 1.14
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 6.81
+497%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 1831
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 10914
+496%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 268
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 1462
+446%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 762
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 4555
+498%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 6.81
Recency no data 21 July 2020
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has a 497.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2020 years, 100% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 61.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q6600 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Core 2 Quad Q6600
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1832 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 496 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.