Atom x3-3205RK vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom x3-3205RK processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2342 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Quad (Desktop) | no data |
| Architecture codename | Kentsfield (2007) | Silvermont (2015) |
| Release date | no data | 2 March 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom x3-3205RK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 56K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom x3-3205RK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom x3-3205RK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom x3-3205RK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom x3-3205RK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2, DDR3 1333 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Mali-450 MP4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 2 Watt |
Atom x3-3205RK has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 5150% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Atom x3-3205RK. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q6600 is a desktop processor while Atom x3-3205RK is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Atom x3-3205RK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
