Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) and Ryzen 9 3900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 256 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 22.31 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 9 |
| Architecture codename | Kentsfield (2007) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 23 July 2007 (17 years ago) | 7 July 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) and Ryzen 9 3900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 2x 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 62 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 582 million | 19,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) and Ryzen 9 3900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 775 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) and Ryzen 9 3900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) and Ryzen 9 3900X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) and Ryzen 9 3900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) and Ryzen 9 3900X.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 July 2007 | 7 July 2019 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 105 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) has 10.5% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 3900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) and Ryzen 9 3900X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) and Ryzen 9 3900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
