Core Solo ULV U1300 vs Core 2 Extreme X6800
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2972 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.36 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Conroe XE (2006) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 27 July 2006 (19 years ago) | April 2006 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and Core Solo ULV U1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.933 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 0.93 GHz | 1.07 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 90 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 60 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 million | 151 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and Core Solo ULV U1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 775 | 479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and Core Solo ULV U1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and Core Solo ULV U1300 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and Core Solo ULV U1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and Core Solo ULV U1300.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 5 Watt |
Core 2 Extreme X6800 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Solo ULV U1300, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 and Intel Core Solo ULV U1300. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Extreme X6800 is a desktop processor while Core Solo ULV U1300 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
