Celeron G5920 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9775
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G5920 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2021 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Comet Lake (2020) |
| Release date | March 2008 (16 years ago) | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G5920 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 63 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 820 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G5920 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 771 | 1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 58 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G5920. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G5920 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G5920 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G5920. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 41.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | UHD 610 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G5920.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 58 Watt |
Core 2 Extreme QX9775 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron G5920, on the other hand, has a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 158.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G5920. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G5920, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
