Xeon D-1747NTE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 136 Watt
2.87
Xeon D-1747NTE
2022
10 cores / 20 threads, 80 Watt
12.64
+340%

Xeon D-1747NTE outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9770 by a whopping 340% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon D-1747NTE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1722635
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.0115.04
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)no data
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon D-1747NTE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Performance-coresno data10
Threads420
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache12 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KB15 MB
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)55 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon D-1747NTE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775FCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)136 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon D-1747NTE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon D-1747NTE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon D-1747NTE are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon D-1747NTE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data384 GB
Max memory channelsno data3
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon D-1747NTE.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 2.87
Xeon D-1747NTE 12.64
+340%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 4611
Xeon D-1747NTE 20279
+340%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.87 12.64
Physical cores 4 10
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 136 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon D-1747NTE has a 340.4% higher aggregate performance score, 150% more physical cores and 400% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 70% lower power consumption.

The Xeon D-1747NTE is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1747NTE is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Intel Xeon D-1747NTE
Xeon D-1747NTE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 249 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Xeon D-1747NTE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon D-1747NTE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.