Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen Embedded V1500B vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Aggregated performance score
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008
4 cores / 4 threads
3.01
+0.7%
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms Ryzen Embedded V1500B by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Ryzen Embedded V1500B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1531 | 1534 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 0.72 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | March 2008 (16 years old) | no data |
| Current price | $790 | no data |
Value for money
no data
Technical specs
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Ryzen Embedded V1500B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 56 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 55 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 820 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Ryzen Embedded V1500B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | LGA775 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 136 Watt | 16 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Ryzen Embedded V1500B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Ryzen Embedded V1500B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Ryzen Embedded V1500B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Ryzen Embedded V1500B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms Ryzen Embedded V1500B by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms Ryzen Embedded V1500B by 1% in Passmark.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 3.01 | 2.99 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 136 Watt | 16 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Ryzen Embedded V1500B. The differences in performance seem too small.
Be aware that Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is a desktop processor while Ryzen Embedded V1500B is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Ryzen Embedded V1500B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
