FX-4150 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770

General info

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and FX-4150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1538	1748
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.72	2.47
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Yorkfield (2007−2009)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date	March 2008 (16 years ago)	23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price	$790	$90

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-4150 has 243% better value for money than Core 2 Extreme QX9770.

Technical specs

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and FX-4150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.2 GHz	4 GHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	192 KB
L2 cache	12 MB (shared)	4 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	45 nm	32 nm
Die size	2x 107 mm2	315 mm2
Maximum core temperature	56 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	55 °C	no data
Number of transistors	820 million	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	Yes
VID voltage range	0.85V-1.3625V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and FX-4150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	LGA775	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	136 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and FX-4150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
FMA	no data	+
AVX	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and FX-4150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and FX-4150 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and FX-4150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and FX-4150.

PCIe version

no data

2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms FX-4150 by 39% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance score	2.98	2.15
Chip lithography	45 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	136 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and FX-4150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---