Core i3-530 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 136 Watt
3.01
+207%

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms Core i3-530 by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i3-530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16522500
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.14
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.021.22
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i3-530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz0.93 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHz2.5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB (shared)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size2x 107 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data73 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)55 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 million382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i3-530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)136 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i3-530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i3-530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i3-530 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i3-530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16.38 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video HDno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i3-530 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i3-530.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 3.01
+207%
i3-530 0.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 4611
+207%
i3-530 1501

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.01 0.98
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 136 Watt 73 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 has a 207.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

i3-530, on the other hand, has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 86.3% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i3-530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Intel Core i3-530
Core i3-530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 240 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 438 votes

Rate Core i3-530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9770 or Core i3-530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.