Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon Neo MV-40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1571not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.72no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon Neo
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Huron (2009)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)6 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Current price$485 $85

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon Neo MV-40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus supportno data1600 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache12 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature56 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)55 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon Neo MV-40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775ASB1
Power consumption (TDP)136 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon Neo MV-40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
AES-NI-no data
VirusProtectno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon Neo MV-40 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon Neo MV-40 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon Neo MV-40. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 4611
+1577%
Athlon Neo MV-40 275

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by 1577% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 136 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon Neo MV-40. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is a desktop processor while Athlon Neo MV-40 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon Neo MV-40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 239 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9770 or Athlon Neo MV-40, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.