Xeon Silver 4210R vs Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Xeon Silver 4210R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 796 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 28.04 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Silver |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.01 |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | November 2007 (17 years ago) | 24 February 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $511 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Xeon Silver 4210R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 24 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 640 KB |
| L2 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 10 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 13.75 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 84 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 64 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 820 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Xeon Silver 4210R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | LGA775 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Xeon Silver 4210R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Xeon Silver 4210R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Xeon Silver 4210R are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Xeon Silver 4210R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 115.212 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Xeon Silver 4210R.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 10 |
| Threads | 4 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 100 Watt |
Xeon Silver 4210R has 150% more physical cores and 400% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Xeon Silver 4210R. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4210R is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Xeon Silver 4210R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
