Atom C3508 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2704
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiencyno data3.94
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release dateNovember 2007 (18 years ago)15 August 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64K (per core)224 KB
L2 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)64 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA775FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Atom C3508.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 11 Watt

Atom C3508 has a 221% more advanced lithography process, and 1082% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Intel Atom C3508. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is a desktop processor while Atom C3508 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 136 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.