Core 2 Duo T5800 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Duo T5800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2273not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore 2 ExtremeIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Merom (2006−2008)
Release dateAugust 2008 (15 years ago)1 October 2008 (15 years ago)
Current price$844 $44

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Duo T5800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2 GHz
Bus support1066 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache12 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C85 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175V1.075V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Duo T5800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketPGA478PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Duo T5800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Demand Based Switching--
AMT++
FSB parity--
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Duo T5800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Duo T5800 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1805
+187%
Core 2 Duo T5800 628

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5800 by 187% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 3114
+55.7%
Core 2 Duo T5800 2000

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5800 by 56% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 10882
+193%
Core 2 Duo T5800 3716

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5800 by 193% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 3780
+131%
Core 2 Duo T5800 1640

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5800 by 131% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Duo T5800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Duo T5800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
Core 2 Duo T5800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 90 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 71 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo T5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9300 or Core 2 Duo T5800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.