Celeron 585 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9300

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Celeron 585 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2377not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore 2 Extremeno data
Power efficiency2.40no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)no data
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)1 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Celeron 585 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHzno data
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache12 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175V0.95-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Celeron 585 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketPGA478PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Celeron 585. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switching--
AMT+no data
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Celeron 585 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Celeron 585 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 31 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 585, on the other hand, has 45.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Celeron 585. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Celeron 585, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Intel Celeron 585
Celeron 585

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 91 vote

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 6 votes

Rate Celeron 585 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9300 or Celeron 585, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.