Pentium D 820 vs Core 2 Extreme QX6850

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX6850
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
1.44
+365%
Pentium D 820
2005
2 cores / 2 threads, 95 Watt
0.31

Core 2 Extreme QX6850 outperforms Pentium D 820 by a whopping 365% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and Pentium D 820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21763085
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Extreme (Desktop)Pentium D
Power efficiency1.050.31
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Smithfield (2005)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)May 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and Pentium D 820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data28 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data206 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data64 °C
Number of transistorsno data169 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and Pentium D 820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataPLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and Pentium D 820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and Pentium D 820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and Pentium D 820 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and Pentium D 820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX6850 1.44
+365%
Pentium D 820 0.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme QX6850 2292
+359%
Pentium D 820 499

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Extreme QX6850 4450
+215%
Pentium D 820 1412

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 0.31
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX6850 has a 364.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium D 820, on the other hand, has 36.8% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Extreme QX6850 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium D 820 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6850 and Pentium D 820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850
Core 2 Extreme QX6850
Intel Pentium D 820
Pentium D 820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 52 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 171 vote

Rate Pentium D 820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX6850 or Pentium D 820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.