EPYC Embedded 8434P vs Core 2 Extreme QX6800

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and EPYC Embedded 8434P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Siena (2023−2024)
Release dateApril 2007 (17 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and EPYC Embedded 8434P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads496
Base clock speed2.93 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm5 nm
Die size2x 143 mm24x 73 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors582 million35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and EPYC Embedded 8434P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775SP6
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and EPYC Embedded 8434P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and EPYC Embedded 8434P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and EPYC Embedded 8434P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 48
Threads 4 96
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 200 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX6800 has 53.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8434P, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Extreme QX6800 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 8434P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and EPYC Embedded 8434P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800
Core 2 Extreme QX6800
AMD EPYC Embedded 8434P
EPYC Embedded 8434P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 10 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX6800 or EPYC Embedded 8434P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.