Duron 1300 vs Core 2 Extreme QX6700

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Duron 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2244not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Extreme (Desktop)AMD Duron
Power efficiency0.97no data
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)K7 (2000−2004)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)30 January 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Duron 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate1066 MHz200 MT/s
Multiplierno data13
L2 cacheno data64 KB
Chip lithography65 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data105.68 mm2
Number of transistorsno data25 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Duron 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt60 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Duron 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 60 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

Duron 1300, on the other hand, has 116.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Duron 1300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Duron 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
AMD Duron 1300
Duron 1300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 45 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5 votes

Rate Duron 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX6700 or Duron 1300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.