E2-2000 vs Core 2 Duo U7700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo U7700
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.27
E2-2000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.31
+14.8%

E2-2000 outperforms Core 2 Duo U7700 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo U7700 and E2-2000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31423104
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD E-Series
Power efficiency2.551.63
Architecture codenameMerom-2048 (2006−2008)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date27 July 2006 (18 years ago)6 January 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo U7700 and E2-2000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.33 GHz1.75 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm40 nm
Die size143 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.8V-0.975Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo U7700 and E2-2000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPFT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo U7700 and E2-2000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo U7700 and E2-2000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo U7700 and E2-2000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo U7700 and E2-2000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7340

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo U7700 0.27
E2-2000 0.31
+14.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo U7700 429
E2-2000 496
+15.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 0.31
Recency 27 July 2006 6 January 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 18 Watt

Core 2 Duo U7700 has 80% lower power consumption.

E2-2000, on the other hand, has a 14.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

The E2-2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo U7700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo U7700 and E2-2000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo U7700
Core 2 Duo U7700
AMD E2-2000
E2-2000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo U7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 58 votes

Rate E2-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo U7700 or E2-2000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.